Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
2.
Oncologist ; 26(2): e336-e337, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-845087

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 has grown to be a global public health emergency. The rapid spread of the infection has raised many questions in the oncohematological scientific community regarding the appropriateness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We here report two cases of patients who received ASCT at our Institute during the epidemic in Italy, affected with Hodgkin lymphoma and germ cell tumor, respectively. The two patients underwent a nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on hospital admittance and during the period of bone marrow aplasia. They were attended to exclusively by dedicated health care staff who followed specifically implemented protocols for bedside nursing and care. They completed the procedure without unexpected side effect. Our experience demonstrates how ASCT can be performed safely if procedures are reorganized ad hoc to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Endodermal Sinus Tumor/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Infection Control/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis , Hodgkin Disease/immunology , Humans , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Protective Clothing/standards , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/standards , Transplantation, Autologous/standards , Treatment Outcome
3.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(3)2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-797155

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Effective implementation of standard precautions specific to COVID-19 is a challenge for hospitals within the existing constraints of time and resources. AIM: To rapidly design and operationalise personal protective equipment (PPE) donning and doffing areas required for a COVID-19 care facility. METHODS: Literature review was done to identify all issues pertaining to donning and doffing in terms of Donabedian's structure, process and outcome. Training on donning and doffing was given to hospital staff. Donning and doffing mock drills were held. 5S was used as a tool to set up donning and doffing areas. Instances of donning and doffing were observed for protocol deviations and errors. Plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted every alternate day for 4 weeks. The initiative was reported using Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines. RESULTS: Best practices in donning and doffing were described. Our study recommends a minimum area of 16 m2 each for donning and doffing rooms. Verbally assisted doffing was found most useful than visual prompts. DISCUSSION: Challenges included sustaining the structure and process of donning and doffing, varied supplies of PPE which altered sequencing of donning and/or doffing, and training non-healthcare workers such as plumbers, electricians and drivers who were required during emergencies in the facility. CONCLUSION: Our study used evidence-based literature and quality improvement (QI) tools to design and operationalise donning and doffing areas with focus on people, task and environment. Our QI will enable healthcare facilities to rapidly prototype donning and doffing areas in a systematic way.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Occupational Health/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Female , Health Personnel/standards , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Protective Clothing/standards , Quality Improvement , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
4.
J Bras Nefrol ; 42(2 suppl 1): 9-11, 2020 Aug 26.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-740458

ABSTRACT

These recommendations were created after the publication of informative note 3/2020- CGGAP/DESF/SAPS/MS, of April 4, 2020, in which the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommended the use of a cloth mask by the population, in public places. Taking into account the necessary prioritization of the provision of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for patients with suspected or confirmed disease, as well as for healthcare professionals, the SBN is favorable concerning the wear of cloth masks by chronic kidney patients in dialysis, in public settings, except in the dialysis setting. The present recommendations have eleven items, related to this rationale, the procedures, indications, contraindications, as well as appropriate fabrics for the mask, and hygiene care to be adopted. These recommendations may change, at any time, in the light of new evidence.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Masks/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Renal Dialysis , Textiles , Brazil , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Nephrology/standards , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Protective Clothing/standards , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical , Urology Department, Hospital/standards
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(3): 605-609, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-706283

ABSTRACT

At the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hand hygiene audits indicated decreased compliance in a 12-bed critical care (CC) area with ventilated COVID-19 patients, where staff used personal protective equipment (PPE), including sessional use of long-sleeved gowns in accordance with the recommendations of Public Health England. There was also a cluster of three central venous catheter (CVC) infections along with increases in the number of patients from whom enteric Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were isolated from sterile sites. Environmental sampling of near-patient surfaces and frequently touched sites demonstrated that 11.5% of areas were contaminated with enteric GNB in the COVID-19 CC area, compared with 2.6% and 2.7% in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 general wards, respectively. Following a risk assessment, hospital policy was changed to replace long-sleeved gowns with short-sleeved gowns. The CC unit underwent enhanced cleaning with hypochlorite-based disinfectant and was resampled 8 days later. On resampling, no GNB were isolated from the CC unit. Following this change in PPE, hand hygiene compliance returned to baseline standards and no further CVC infections were identified. Staff reported a preference for short-sleeved gowns. No evidence currently exists that PPE beyond that recommended for pandemic influenza (respiratory protection plus standard PPE) adds to the protection of healthcare workers (HCWs) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Long-sleeved gowns prevent HCWs performing hand hygiene effectively. While it is imperative that HCWs are adequately protected, protection of patients from infection hazards is equally important. Further studies are necessary to establish risks from PPE to inform a review of current guidance.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Critical Care/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Protective Clothing/standards , Surgical Attire/virology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , England , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Med Leg J ; 88(1_suppl): 47-49, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-657145

ABSTRACT

In the context of Covid-19, personal protective equipment is much needed and often in short supply as a protection against the virus, but nobody until recently was discussing the downside of its prolonged use by its wearers. Increasing numbers of health care workers feel unwell using it and are overheating and some have fainted. Will it impair their professional performance? This article considers this aspect of PPE based upon the personal experience of a Forensic team at AIIMS Bhopal in India who wore it during autopsy work and proposed recommendations to minimise it.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Workload/standards , Body Temperature , COVID-19 , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , India , Personal Protective Equipment/adverse effects , Protective Clothing/standards , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 32(7): e13930, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-593251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the peak of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, care for patients with gastrointestinal motility and functional disorders was largely suspended. In the recovery phases of the pandemic, non-urgent medical care is resumed, but there is a lack of guidance for restarting and safely conducting motility and function testing. Breath tests and insertion of manometry and pH-monitoring probes carry a risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread through droplet formation. METHODS: A panel of experts from the European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) evaluated emerging national and single-center recommendations to provide the best current evidence and a pragmatic approach to ensure the safe conduct of motility and function testing for both healthcare professionals and patients. RESULTS: At a general level, this involves evaluation of the urgency of the procedure, evaluation of the infectious risk associated with the patient, the investigation and the healthcare professional(s) involved, provision of the test planning and test units, education and training of staff, and use of personnel protection equipment. Additional guidance is provided for specific procedures such as esophageal manometry, pH monitoring, and breath tests. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The ESNM guidelines provide pragmatic and appropriate guidance for the safe conduct of motility and function testing in the COVID-19 pandemic and early recovery phase.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Gastroenterology/standards , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Neurology/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Recovery of Function/physiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Europe/epidemiology , Expert Testimony/methods , Expert Testimony/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Protective Clothing/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical/standards
8.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 32(7): e13926, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-457062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic, declared by WHO on March 13, 2020, had a major global impact on the healthcare system and services. In the acute phase, the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the aerodigestive tract limited activities in the gastroenterology clinic and procedures to emergencies only. Motility and function testing was interrupted and as we enter the recovery phase, restarting these procedures requires a safety-focused approach with adequate infection prevention for patients and healthcare professionals. METHODS: We summarized knowledge on the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the aerodigestive tract and the risk of spread with motility and functional testing. We surveyed 39 European centers documenting how the pandemic affected activities and which measures they are considering for restarting these measurements. We propose recommendations based on current knowledge as applied in our center. RESULTS: Positioning of catheters for gastrointestinal motility tests carries a concern for aerosol-borne infection of healthcare workers. The risk is low with breath tests. The surveyed centers stopped almost all motility and function tests from the second half of March. The speed of restarting and the safety measures taken varied highly. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Based on these findings, we provided recommendations and practical relevant information for motility and function test procedures in the COVID-19 pandemic era, to guarantee a high-quality patient care with adequate infection prevention.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Gastroenterology/methods , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Europe/epidemiology , Gastroenterology/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Protective Clothing/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL